data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696d3/696d3fd1301f03e373aea298063572484bcbc585" alt=""
When the Department of Homeland Security released its Homeland Threat Assessment earlier this month, it emphasized that self-proclaimed white supremacist groups are the most dangerous threat to U.S. security. But the report misleadingly added that there had been “over 100 days of violence and destruction in our cities,” referring to the anti-racism uprisings of this past summer.
In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters.
Since 2017, we have been collecting data on political crowds in the United States, including the protests that surged during the summer. We have almost finished collecting data from May to June, having already documented 7,305 events in thousands of towns and cities in all 50 states and D.C., involving millions of attendees.
I think it’s important to have news stories like this, especially from a respected institution like Harvard. People (not just American whites), need to know that protest movements supporting causes like BLM are nonviolent. It takes credibility away from rouge news commentators like Fox who try to paint them as a threat to society.
And in other news, grass is green. 😒
We already knew this, but I guess
it is good to have some data behind it.